Machine Learning-Based Modeling for Industrial Process Optimization

Authors

  • Desy Putri Ayu Institut Informatika Dan Bisnis Darmajaya, Lampung, Indonesia
  • Henny Agustina Institut Informatika Dan Bisnis Darmajaya, Lampung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63876/ijtm.v5i1.16

Keywords:

machine learning, industrial process optimization, predictive modeling, deep learning, digital twin, process control

Abstract

Industrial process optimization has become increasingly critical as manufacturing sectors strive to enhance productivity, reduce operational costs, and minimize energy consumption while maintaining product quality. Traditional modeling approaches, such as mechanistic and statistical models, often struggle to capture the complex, nonlinear, and dynamic relationships inherent in modern industrial processes. In response, machine learning (ML) has emerged as a powerful alternative, offering data-driven modeling capabilities that can adapt to intricate process behaviors without requiring exhaustive prior knowledge of underlying physical mechanisms. This paper presents a comprehensive review and framework for ML-based modeling in industrial process optimization. We examine commonly employed ML techniques including artificial neural networks, support vector machines, random forests, gradient boosting, and deep learning architectures and evaluate their applicability across key optimization tasks such as process parameter tuning, predictive maintenance, quality prediction, and energy efficiency improvement. A systematic analysis of recent literature reveals that ensemble and deep learning methods consistently outperform conventional approaches in predictive accuracy and robustness, particularly when large volumes of sensor data are available. However, challenges related to data quality, model interpretability, generalization across operating conditions, and integration with existing control systems remain significant barriers to widespread adoption. To address these gaps, we propose a practical modeling framework that combines data preprocessing, feature engineering, model selection, hyperparameter optimization, and validation strategies tailored to industrial settings. The framework is illustrated through representative case studies from the manufacturing and process industries, demonstrating measurable improvements in yield, throughput, and energy consumption. Finally, we discuss emerging directions, including physics-informed machine learning, transfer learning for cross-process adaptation, and digital twin integration, which hold promise for advancing the next generation of intelligent industrial optimization systems. The findings provide actionable insights for researchers and practitioners seeking to leverage ML modeling to achieve sustainable and efficient industrial operations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] E. Schäffer, H. Leibinger, A. Stamm, M. Brossog, and J. Franke, “Configuration based process and knowledge management by structuring the software landscape of global operating industrial enterprises with Microservices,” Procedia Manufacturing, vol. 24, pp. 86–93, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.06.013.

[2] Y. Seo and N. Wei, “Decoding PETase diversity through global landscape profiling: toward superior enzymes for plastic recycling,” Trends in Biochemical Sciences, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 464–466, Jun. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2025.03.012.

[3] E. Castillo et al., “Supporting Informed Vaccine Decision-Making and Communication in Pregnancy Through the Vaccines in Pregnancy Canada Intervention: Multimethod Co-Design Study,” J Med Internet Res, vol. 27, p. e77446, Dec. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.2196/77446.

[4] C. Jiang et al., “Towards smart city energy-transportation coupling system resilience enhancement via multi-type mobile emergency resources: a hybrid data-model driven approach,” Applied Energy, vol. 427, p. 129197, Jan. 2027, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2026.129197.

[5] C. Günther et al., “Machine learning for drill core image analysis: A review,” Ore Geology Reviews, vol. 187, p. 106974, Dec. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2025.106974.

[6] M. Rashid, A. A. Khan, M. Ibraheem, M. Asim, and M. K. Saleem, “A comparative evaluation of tree-based ensemble ML models for accurate drag prediction of ½ power series nosecone,” Aerospace Science and Technology, vol. 178, p. 113275, Nov. 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2026.113275.

[7] M. Naumann et al., “Energy efficiency improvement for decarbonization in manufacturing industry: A review,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 338, p. 119763, Aug. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2025.119763.

[8] V. Pandey, A. Sircar, K. Yadav, and N. Bist, “A proposed HAZOP based upgradation model for improvement in existing industrial practices: a geothermal energy industry case study,” International Journal of Energy Sector Management, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 1356–1377, Nov. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJESM-12-2022-0010.

[9] A. Chiurco, M. Elbasheer, F. Longo, L. Nicoletti, and V. Solina, “Data Modeling and ML Practice for Enabling Intelligent Digital Twins in Adaptive Production Planning and Control,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 217, pp. 1908–1917, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.12.391.

[10] M. M. Elsabahy, M. Emam, and S. A. Nada, “Developing deep learning-based model for silicon-based solar cells in concentrator photovoltaic systems: A real-time prediction for efficient application-oriented performance,” Applied Energy, vol. 388, p. 125644, Jun. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125644.

[11] C. Wang, Y. Xie, Y. Zeng, Z. Gao, and P. Cai, “Aspen plus simulation-assisted vacuum distillation process optimization via response surface methodology (RSM): High-purity recovery of extractant from complex mixed phenolic raffinate and its industrial feasibility,” Results in Engineering, vol. 28, p. 108183, Dec. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.108183.

[12] M. Liang, Y. Zheng, and S. Li, “Towards hybrid modeling with mechanistic and real-time data embed iterative co-optimization for industrial processes,” Journal of Process Control, vol. 155, p. 103567, Nov. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprocont.2025.103567.

[13] B. P. Adedeji and A. Zaidi, “Radial basis function and feedforward backpropagation artificial neural networks for electric vehicles daily energy consumption and battery capacity estimations,” Next Research, vol. 2, no. 4, p. 101006, Dec. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nexres.2025.101006.

[14] H. Abdelsalam, A. Souri, and N. İnanç, “A time series forecasting approach based on gradient boosting method for IoT-based solar energy production systems,” Energy Storage and Saving, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 413–420, Dec. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enss.2025.04.003.

[15] C. H. B. Apribowo, M. D. Ashidqi, M. Nizam, and A. Purwanto, “Data-driven modeling of lithium-ion battery degradation using XGBoost with extended Kalman filter-based internal resistance correction,” Results in Engineering, vol. 28, p. 108100, Dec. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.108100.

[16] Z. Li, W. Zhu, Y. Wu, and Z. Wu, “Reliability of analyst recommendations based on the DS-LightGBM model,” Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, vol. 94, p. 102961, Dec. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2025.102961.

[17] A. S. Assiri, “An Optimized Customer Churn Prediction Approach Based on Regularized Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory Model,” CMC, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 1–21, 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2025.069826.

[18] Z. Zhang, Y. Wang, S. Tan, B. Xia, and Y. Luo, “Enhancing Transformer-based models for long sequence time series forecasting via structured matrix,” Neurocomputing, vol. 625, p. 129429, Apr. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2025.129429.

[19] F. Johannessen and M. Jullum, “Finding money launderers using heterogeneous graph neural networks,” The Journal of Finance and Data Science, vol. 11, p. 100175, Dec. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfds.2025.100175.

[20] E. Zheng and Y. Wang, “Shape reconstruction in inverse scattering problems utilizing the physics-informed neural networks with a periodic layer,” Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, vol. 181, p. 106550, Dec. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enganabound.2025.106550.

[21] J.-H. Hu, Y.-N. Sun, and W. Qin, “A dynamic feature selection-based data-driven quality prediction method for soft sensing in the diesel engine assembly system,” Advanced Engineering Informatics, vol. 60, p. 102433, Apr. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2024.102433.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30

How to Cite

Ayu, D. P., & Agustina, H. (2026). Machine Learning-Based Modeling for Industrial Process Optimization. International Journal of Technology and Modeling, 5(1), 60–75. https://doi.org/10.63876/ijtm.v5i1.16

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.