Peer Review Policy

Peer Review Policy for the International Journal of Technology and Modeling

Last Updated: 01-11-2023

The "International Journal of Technology and Modeling" (IJTM) maintains a rigorous and transparent peer review process to ensure the quality and integrity of the articles it publishes. The journal values the contributions of reviewers and their role in upholding the scholarly standards of the publication. This Peer Review Policy outlines the principles and procedures governing the peer review process in IJTM.

1. Types of Peer Review:

Single-Blind Review: IJTM employs a single-blind review process, where the identities of the reviewers are kept confidential. Reviewers are aware of the authors' identities, but the reverse is not true.

2. Selection of Reviewers:

2.1. Reviewers are selected based on their expertise and knowledge in the relevant field of the submitted manuscript. The editorial board may also consider author-recommended reviewers.

2.2. Reviewers should have no conflicts of interest that could compromise the integrity of the review process.

3. Review Process:

3.1. Upon submission, each manuscript undergoes an initial screening by the editorial team to determine its suitability for review. Manuscripts that meet the journal's focus and scope are assigned to one or more reviewers.

3.2. Reviewers evaluate the manuscript's quality, originality, methodology, clarity, and relevance. They provide constructive feedback and may recommend acceptance, revisions, or rejection.

3.3. The peer review process is conducted confidentially. Reviewers are expected to maintain the confidentiality of the review process and not disclose any information about the manuscript.

3.4. Reviewers are encouraged to complete their reviews promptly, typically within a specified timeframe. If reviewers anticipate delays, they should inform the editorial office.

3.5. In cases where reviewers' opinions differ significantly, the editorial team may seek additional opinions or discuss the manuscript with the reviewers to reach a consensus.

4. Reviewer Guidelines:

4.1. Reviewers should evaluate the manuscript objectively and provide constructive feedback.

4.2. Reviewers are encouraged to disclose any potential conflicts of interest and recuse themselves from reviewing if necessary.

4.3. Reviewers should not use or disclose unpublished manuscript content for personal benefit.

5. Author Response:

Authors have the opportunity to respond to reviewers' comments and make revisions based on the feedback.

6. Editorial Decision:

6.1. The editorial team, based on the reviewers' comments and the author's response, makes a decision regarding acceptance, revisions, or rejection of the manuscript.

6.2. The decision is communicated to the authors along with the reviewers' comments, maintaining anonymity of the reviewers.

7. Appeals:

7.1. Authors who believe that the peer review process was conducted unfairly or that there are errors in the review process may appeal the decision.

7.2. Appeals should be submitted in writing to the editorial office and will be reviewed by the journal's editorial board.

8. Reviewer Recognition:

IJTM acknowledges and appreciates the valuable contribution of reviewers. Reviewers' names are not disclosed to the authors, but their efforts are recognized in the form of acknowledgment, certificates, or similar means.

9. Conflict of Interest:

The editorial team and reviewers must disclose any conflicts of interest that could potentially affect the review process.

IJTM is committed to maintaining the highest standards of peer review to ensure the quality, integrity, and credibility of the articles it publishes. Reviewers play a crucial role in this process, and the journal values their dedication and expertise in advancing knowledge in the fields of technology and modeling.

Please contact the journal's editorial office at [Insert Contact Email] for any questions or clarifications regarding the peer review process.