Enhancing Higher-Order Thinking Skills Through Multimedia-Based Inquiry Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63876/ijtm.v2i3.144Keywords:
Higher-Order Thinking Skills, Multimedia Learning, Inquiry-Based Learning, Science Education, Critical Thinking, Interactive LearningAbstract
The development of higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) is essential in science education to foster students’ critical, analytical, and problem-solving abilities. This study explores the effectiveness of multimedia-based inquiry learning in enhancing HOTS among middle school students in science subjects. By integrating multimedia elements—such as animations, simulations, and interactive modules—into an inquiry-based learning framework, students are encouraged to actively engage with scientific concepts through exploration, questioning, and evidence-based reasoning. A quasi-experimental design was employed, involving two groups: one experiencing traditional instruction and the other receiving multimedia-based inquiry learning. The results showed a significant improvement in HOTS among students in the experimental group, as measured by standardized HOTS assessments and classroom performance tasks. This study highlights the potential of multimedia-enhanced inquiry learning as a powerful pedagogical approach to promote deeper understanding and cognitive engagement in science education.
Downloads
References
Y.-M. Huang, L. M. Silitonga, and T.-T. Wu, “Applying a business simulation game in a flipped classroom to enhance engagement, learning achievement, and higher-order thinking skills,” Comput. Educ., vol. 183, p. 104494, Jul. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104494.
T. Jansen and J. Möller, “Teacher judgments in school exams: Influences of students’ lower-order-thinking skills on the assessment of students’ higher-order-thinking skills,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 111, p. 103616, Mar. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103616.
H. Sun, Y. Xie, and J. Lavonen, “Exploring the structure of students’ scientific higher order thinking in science education,” Think. Ski. Creat., vol. 43, p. 100999, Mar. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.100999.
E. Boeren and T. Íñiguez-Berrozpe, “Unpacking PIAAC’s cognitive skills measurements through engagement with Bloom’s taxonomy,” Stud. Educ. Eval., vol. 73, p. 101151, Jun. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101151.
B. C. University of Maryland, “Bloom’s Digital Taxonomy Verbs.” [Online]. Available: https://pivot.umbc.edu/course-design/blooms-digital-taxonomy-verbs/
F. Zhou, J. Mou, and J. Kim, “Toward a meaningful experience: an explanation of the drivers of the continued usage of gamified mobile app services,” Online Inf. Rev., vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 285–303, Mar. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-10-2020-0464.
P. Costes-Onishi and D. Kwek, “Technical skills vs meaning-making: Teacher competencies and strength of inquiry-based learning in aesthetic inquiry,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 130, p. 104152, Aug. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104152.
A. W. Lazonder, “Inquiry-based learning,” in International Encyclopedia of Education(Fourth Edition), Elsevier, 2023, pp. 630–636. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818630-5.14072-2.
C. M. Nzomo, P. Rugano, J. M. Njoroge, and C. M. Gitonga, “Inquiry-based learning and students’ self-efficacy in Chemistry among secondary schools in Kenya,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 1, p. e12672, Jan. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12672.
J. Finn and L. Bradley, “vSim® gerontology and inquiry-based learning enhancing clinical reasoning and preparation for practice,” Teach. Learn. Nurs., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. e146–e150, Oct. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2023.05.002.
A. Zohar, “Challenges in wide scale implementation efforts to foster higher order thinking (HOT) in science education across a whole school system,” Think. Ski. Creat., vol. 10, pp. 233–249, Dec. 2013, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.06.002.
J. Fu, “Innovation of engineering teaching methods based on multimedia assisted technology,” Comput. Electr. Eng., vol. 100, p. 107867, May 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2022.107867.
G. Reinhard and H. Lachnit, “The effect of stimulus probability on pupillary response as an indicator of cognitive processing in human learning and categorization,” Biol. Psychol., vol. 60, no. 2–3, pp. 199–215, Sep. 2002, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0511(02)00031-5.
T. Sumranwanich, K. Boonthaworn, S. Singhakaew, and P. Ounjai, “Time-Restricted Inquiry-Based Learning Promotes Active Student Engagement in Undergraduate Zoology Laboratory,” J. Microbiol. Biol. Educ., vol. 20, no. 1, Jan. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v20i1.1571.
E. E. Park, “Expanding Reference through Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning Videos,” J. Acad. Librariansh., vol. 48, no. 3, p. 102522, May 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2022.102522.
C. Brooking and J. Hunter, “Providing online access to hydrological model simulations through interactive geospatial animations,” Environ. Model. Softw., vol. 43, pp. 163–168, May 2013, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.01.011.
S. Becker, P. Klein, A. Gößling, and J. Kuhn, “Using mobile devices to enhance inquiry-based learning processes,” Learn. Instr., vol. 69, p. 101350, Oct. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101350.
K.-O. Nuttariya, C. Sumalee, K. Issara, and S. Charuni, “Designing Framework of Multimedia Learning Environment to Enhance Problem Solving Transfer,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 46, pp. 3421–3425, 2012, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.077.
Y. Song, J. Cao, Y. Yang, and C.-K. Looi, “Mapping primary students’ mobile collaborative inquiry-based learning behaviours in science collaborative problem solving via learning analytics,” Int. J. Educ. Res., vol. 114, p. 101992, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.101992.
F. Wijnen, J. Walma van der Molen, and J. Voogt, “Measuring primary school teachers’ attitudes towards stimulating higher-order thinking (SHOT) in students: Development and validation of the SHOT questionnaire,” Think. Ski. Creat., vol. 42, p. 100954, Dec. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100954.
M.-A. Jarvis and O. B. Baloyi, “Scaffolding in reflective journaling: A means to develop higher order thinking skills in undergraduate learners,” Int. J. Africa Nurs. Sci., vol. 12, p. 100195, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijans.2020.100195.
